{"id":161,"date":"2010-01-30T08:10:52","date_gmt":"2010-01-30T16:10:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/01-2\/wheat-from-the-chaff-a-review-of-cormac-mccarthys-the-road"},"modified":"2011-07-13T17:29:59","modified_gmt":"2011-07-14T00:29:59","slug":"wheat-from-the-chaff-a-review-of-cormac-mccarthys-the-road","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/archives\/161","title":{"rendered":"A Review of Cormac McCarthy&#8217;s The Road"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"wp_fb_like_button\" style=\"margin:5px 0;float:none;height:30px;\"><script src=\"http:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/all.js#xfbml=1\"><\/script><fb:like href=\"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/archives\/161\" send=\"false\" layout=\"standard\" width=\"450\" show_faces=\"false\" font=\"arial\" action=\"recommend\" colorscheme=\"light\"><\/fb:like><\/div><div id=\"content\">\n<div class=\"blog\"><!-- back and forward --><\/p>\n<div class=\"blogbody\">\n<p><span>I have a rather ambiguous opinion of Cormac McCarthy\u2019s <em>The Road<\/em>. On one hand, it\u2019s a beautifully phrased novel, full of powerful images and rich language. On the other hand, the plot is rather pedestrian, and the author\u2019s defiance of writing conventions is tiresome. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: small;\">There\u2019s no doubt that McCarthy is a gifted writer. Many passages are profoundly beautiful and show McCarthy\u2019s daunting command of language. He is a fabulous painter of words, utilizing an often inventive terminology. For example, the boy is described in an impressively figurative manner: \u201cKnobby spine-bones. The razarous shoulder blades sawing under the pale skin\u201d (p. 218). Quite often, individual words surprise and enrich: \u201crasping\u201d, \u201cviscera\u201d, \u201cdentil\u201d, \u201cmacadam\u201d, and so on. In an age of anti-intellectualism, where so-called \u201cbig words\u201d expose a person to abuse like glasses do in a Khmer Rouge nightmare, McCarthy\u2019s breadth of vocabulary is impressive, perhaps even inspiring. Finally, the relationship between man and boy seems genuine and real, and moves beyond the easy nihilism for which McCarthy is often accused. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: small;\">Nevertheless, there many disappointing parts to the novel. The plot is predictable and surprisingly linear: look down at a town or house; search town or house for food; discover amazingly well-preserved food stores just in time to avoid starvation; avoid grisly cannibals when necessary; climb to the top of the next hill and consider the depravity of man (or at least flat caricatures of depraved beasts); repeat sequence at least four times. The plot seems awfully amenable to a screen play, almost as if <em>The Road<\/em> was written as a novelization of a movie. McCarthy\u2019s well-known aversion to grammar rules also grates, and I personally think it overwhelms the linguistic and emotional side of the book. I don\u2019t really care about the lack of apostrophes or quotation marks; I get the rather bludgeoned symbolism about the artificiality and fragility of society. But the apparently random use of sentence fragments becomes incredibly annoying. I spent much of my time filling in the subject or the predicate, or both. Such undue effort led me to skip-read much of the novel, only occasionally slowing down to savour an occasional passage. Are such rules of writing really so imposing? McCarthy seems to be saying yes, but it\u2019s a bit like arguing the colour scheme of traffic lights is fascist, when such conventionality is really about moving on to more important things. In the end, the fragments and other broken rules seem like gimmicks, and convince me that McCarthy should have spent more time on plot development rather than the arbitrary rules of grammar. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: small;\">So <em>The Road<\/em> leaves me perplexed; maybe it\u2019s his Pulitzer Prize for the novel, and maybe it\u2019s because other people lavish such praise on his book. If Oprah loves the novel, it must be good, no? Yet for me, it has the whiff of pretentiousness. McCarthy is a great writer, no doubt, but beating up sentences and punctuation does not replace good old fashioned story telling. <\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"posted\">Posted by <a href=\"mailto:cwelch@lexiconic.net\">Colin Welch<\/a> at 11:39 AM<br \/>\n<em>Edited on: Sunday, January 31, 2010 4:54 PM<\/em><br \/>\nCategories: <a href=\"http:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff2\/archives\/cat_books.html\">Books<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff2\/archives\/cat_inaphilosophicalmood.html\">In a Philosophical Mood<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff2\/archives\/cat_language.html\">Language<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff2\/archives\/cat_modernculture.html\">Modern Culture<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff2\/archives\/cat_movies.html\">Movies<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have a rather ambiguous opinion of Cormac McCarthy\u2019s The Road. On one hand, it\u2019s a beautifully phrased novel, full of powerful images and rich language. On the other hand, the plot is rather pedestrian, and the author\u2019s defiance of writing conventions is tiresome. There\u2019s no doubt that McCarthy is a gifted writer. Many passages [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=161"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":644,"href":"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/161\/revisions\/644"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexiconic.net\/wheatfromthechaff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}